Interesting piece from Dr Brett Steenbarger
…..Here are a few valuable insights I’ve gathered from my recent work with skilled, successful traders:
1) What you trade is as important as how you trade: The successful traders are trading instruments that move in meaningful ways and that capture their best ideas. That means trading instruments that show the right kind of movement, and it means expressing your ideas through positions that offer the best risk/reward. The successful traders have many ways to capture ideas: many time frames, many instruments (stocks, futures, options), many markets……
More here – TraderFeed
One of the qualities that impresses me most about people is their resilience – that ability to hang in the fight for a time long after most would have quit. And then if things have not gone their way to pick themselves up and start again. If we take a broader perspective human history in all its facets is only advanced by such people – those who stick with a situation and by simple dint of personality push through.
However, there is a dark side to this and it is the holding the line or clinging to a belief long after it should have become apparent that that they were wrong. We have all known people who have stuck with relationships or jobs long after the point of no return had been reached. And in some cases it undoubtedly not because of their resilience but rather that a change is simply too frightening or they actually lack the resources to take the plunge. But many hang in like a demented barnacle often as if to simply spite themselves – their own ego drives them towards destruction.
This ego driven headlong dive towards self destrution fascinates me because for many years I have been following the fate of John Hussman the manager of Hussman Strategic Fund. Hussman is a former professor of economics and international finance at the Uninversity of Michigan. So in an academic sense he is no fool but as is so often the case smart people use their intellectct to defend their emotional failings.
To begin to understand why I find Hussman an interesting case study we first need to understand the investment approach that this fund adopts. The following is from their prospectus –
The Funds portfolio will typically be invested in common stocks favored by the Hussman Strategic Advisors Inc, the funds investment manager , except for modest cash balances arising in connection withe Funds day to day operations. When market conditions are unfavourable in the view of the investment manager , the fund may use options and index futures , or effect short sales of exchange traded funds (‘ETFS’) to reduce the exposure of the Funds stock portfolio to the impact of general market fluctuations. When market conditions are viewed as favourable, the Fund may use options to increase its exposure to the impact of general market fluctuations.
This all sounds reasonable, it is a basic stock portfolio that at times undertake some form of hedging to reduce the impact of market fluctuations. And this approach found great success during the GFC. As can be seen from the chart below this fund easily outdistanced the S&P500 and the funds under managed grew to US$6.7 billion. Since then the fund has shrunk to approximately $US365M.
The reasons for this contraction are instructive and can be found in the funds prospectus. The fund speaks of hedging exposure in unfavourable market conditions. To those of us on the outside this means market downturns as defined by some form of collapse in the trend. This is something that is easily quantifiable and therefore is binary in nature. In my simple world the market is either going up or down. However, Hussman and his management team have a narrative and the narrative is that despite the market going up continually since the GFC all stocks are overvalued. So whilst they may be invested in these stocks they also have in place hedges of equal sizes. Hedging is a drag on performance – it costs money and this cost translates to poor performance. Since the GFC Hussman’s funds have lost on average 2.1% pa whilst the market has gained 2.3%.
Since the bull market began Hussman has been calling for a slide in the overall market to match that experienced during the Great Depression and he has positioned his fund accordingly. This internally driven narrative is directing the investment strategy which in in turn pushing the fund into the ground.
He has issued a never ending stream of warnings about the market –
November 2010: Bubble, Crash, Bubble, Crash, Bubble…
March 2011: Anatomy of a Bubble.
March 2012: A False Sense of Security.
November 2013: A Textbook Pre-Crash Bubble.
July 2014: Yes, This Is An Equity Bubble.
October 2015: Not The Time To Be Bubble-Tolerant.
October 2016: Sizing Up the Bubble.
March 2017: The Most Broadly Overvalued Moment In Market History.
June 2017: Two Supports Kicked Away Already.
July 2017: Salient Features Of Bull Market Peaks.
These market calls have an almost plaintive nature about them, as if he is desperate for the market to agree with him and his thesis. All of this is driven by a desperate need to have the narrative proved correct, once again such a desire is more reflective of ego than common sense. To the astute trader such behaviour is incredibly strange since being wrong is part of being a trader. But so too is the ability to adapt and learn from being wrong, there is resilience and then there is suicidal behaviour that has a very intriguing tone to it. And Hussmans behaviour has a strange tone of self destruction about it.
If there were a cornerstone to trading it would be the ability not only to be resilient when in drawdown but also to accept that we get things wrong. Sometimes there is a flaw in our methodology that we have not seen and that we simply have been lucky up until this point. This does raise the question of when do you know you have entered this spiral of self destruction and to my way of thinking the answer is not that hard. If you have been losing money for the better part of a decade then it is fairly obvious that there is something seriously wrong in your methodology.
I got bounced this piece by someone else this morning and asked for comment. I was too lazy to actually write anything long winded about how it is nonsense to try and predict the market, how no one knows where the market is going, or how it is foolish to base your investment decisions on waiting for a crash . But then I remembered this excellent post by Pension Partners someone else had sent me and I fired that off to them.
There are two points in the original article that need commenting on. The first is that no one does know where the market is going. It is not simply that a small cadre do know and are keeping it a secret from you for whatever purpose. No one knows but very few are inclined to tell you that – particularly when they have a vastly well paid job at stake. And anyone who does claim to know is simply caught within their own narrative fallacy and these fallacies are often self correcting. It is safest to think of people who offer predictions about the market as being in the small psychological space as people who make predictions about the end of the world. You will note by the simple fact that you are reading this that none of the predictions regarding the end of the world have to date come true. Undeterred those who make the predictions simply change their story – narratives are always corrected to protect our ego.
However, there is something more troubling for traders with regard to predictions. The moment I make a prediction I have staked my reputation and my ego on that prediction. I am emotionally wedded to this prediction – this coupling means that I am loathe to make adjustments to it or walk away from it. For example if I make a public prediction that silver will double and take a position in accordance with that prediction I am very reluctant to take any form of defensive action if the silver decides it doesn’t want to cooperate with my prediction.
There is a certain freedom in having an approach that makes no predictions because it frees me from the emotional angst of being emotionally tied to a position. This in turn makes it much easier to take any form of defensive action of switch views completely